MATISSE- BONNARD : LONG LIVE PAINTING!
Edited by Felix Krämer
Prestel Publishing. 240 pages. £45. ISBN 978-3791-35632-7
Reviewed by Jim Burns
There are plenty of books about artists and writers who were
friends, but then fell out over some problem or other. It probably
makes for a good story if an author can recount tales of arguments,
gossip, back-stabbing, feuds, physical fights, and scores settled in
novels and autobiographies, or even perhaps in a painting. But the
heartening thing about the friendship between Henri Matisse and
Pierre Bonnard was that it lasted for many years and that it never
came apart, nor did the admiration that each genuinely felt for the
other’s work.
Bonnard was born in 1867, Matisse in 1869. Coincidentally, both
studied law when they were young, and then gave it up to concentrate
on painting. Bonnard established himself quite quickly in the
Parisian art world. He had attracted attention with his
illustrations for books, and designs for posters, including a
notable one advertising champagne, and with his friends, Édouard
Vuillard and Félix Valloton, he formed a group called the “Nabis”
(derived from a Jewish word for ”prophets”).
It’s said that work from his Nabi involvements was
“characterised by a free play of perspectives and a markedly flat
handling of paint”. By
1906 he was sufficiently established to have a solo exhibition at
the Galerie Ambroise Vollard. Matisse visited the exhibition, but he
had probably known Bonnard for some time before that.
While Bonnard was prospering, Matisse was struggling to make a
living from his art work. He took odd jobs to get by, and was hired
at an hourly rate to paint a frieze of laurel garlands at the Grand
Palais for the 1900 Paris World Exhibition. His breakthrough came in
1905 when he exhibited “Woman with a Hat” at the Salon d’automne.
Critics attacked him, and labelled him and André Derain, Maurice de
Vlaminck, and Albert Marquet as “fauves” (wild beasts), a name
which, like others meant to be derogatory, was cheerfully adopted
and went down in art history.
Matisse’s career began to develop after the fuss over “Woman with a
Hat” caused artists and critics to pay closer consideration to his
work. By 1917, when he began to spend more time on the
Bonnard, too, moved to
It was certainly true that, within a few years, Matisse could afford
quite luxurious accommodation and a chauffeur-driven car, whereas
Bonnard lived in a sparsely furnished house. There may have been
personality reasons for this, of course. Matisse was an astute
businessman when it came to promoting and selling his work, whereas
Bonnard was noted for his reticence and his reluctance to part with
paintings, even when people offered to buy them. He would say that a
painting wasn’t finished. And if he did agree to let someone
purchase the work when it was completed, there was no guarantee that
it would be what the prospective customer thought he was getting.
Bonnard had become dissatisfied with what he had done and changed
it.
The differences in working
practices between Matisse and Bonnard are striking. Both were
“convinced of the importance of reality as the origin of their
work”. And together they may well have revived the idea of the
“interior”, which “fell somewhat into disrepute” as the twentieth
century developed. Matisse’s interiors perhaps reflected his 1908
statement about the kind of art he aspired to create:
“What I dream of is an art of balance, of purity and serenity,
devoid of troubling or disturbing subject matter, an art which could
be for every mental worker, for the businessman as well as the man
of letters, for example, a soothing, calming influence on the mind,
something like a good armchair which provides relaxation from
physical fatigue”.
It has been suggested that Bonnard’s paintings have “a sense of the
uncanny lurking behind their blithe facade of beauty and happiness”.
Their darker (compared to Matisse) tones often do seem to suggest
that there is a tension in the relationship between the model and
the artist. They also “unmistakably and repeatedly tended to
dissolve the materiality of things in his paintings”. His still
lives show a “distinct inclination towards abstraction”. What is
portrayed is “the emotionally felt recollection of a situation and
less the actual seeing of it”.
This tension referred to may have come about because Bonnard mostly
used one model, his partner, Marthe. She later became his wife. He
did, at one point, have another model, a situation which ended
tragically when Marthe discovered that the relationship had gone
beyond modelling, intervened to break it up, and the other woman
committed suicide. It’s not clear how much this affected Bonnard. He
continued to paint Marthe in various poses for many years, but
always seems to have seen her as forever young. There is a colourful
description of her by the photographer, Brassai :
“With her slender, graceful body, her luxurious mass of hair, her
periwinkle-blue eyes, her high, firm breasts, and her long legs,
she’d been his favourite model all her life…….This febrile woman,
with her delicate health, who spent her time indoors, who was fond
of water and the warmth of the bathroom and bed sheets, was the
embodiment of the sensual woman in Bonnard’s paintings who dream, do
their hair, dress, or gaze at themselves in their mirrors”.
Bonnard appears to have sometimes used photographs as an aid, and
Beate Söntgen notes that he “generally painted without the model
being present, even if several images suggest the co-presence of
model and painter”. It’s further said that “the figure portrayed is
generally constrained by the space, anchored into it by means of
framings and boundaries internal to the image”.
There is a contrast with Matisse who “always painted in the presence
of the model”, whether of his family circle or professional models.
The latter usually became “part of the household and often worked
together with the artist for a long time”. He was quoted as saying,
“I am completely dependent on my model”.
In Dita Amory’s essay on the models in both artists’
paintings, it’s said that: “All of Matisse’s nudes are rich in
sensuality and allusions to fertility. Matisse actually admitted to
the erotic charge, confident that his powers as a painter would
subdue the impulse”. It was later in his life, when he was turned
sixty, that he met Lydia Delectorskaya, who became his model and
studio assistant. His relationship with her eventually led to his
wife, Amélie, leaving him.
Living as they both did in the rich landscape of the
Bonnard, by contrast, did paint landscapes in the South of France:
“Indeed much of his reputation as a leading heir of Impressionism
was due to his exuberant depictions of sun-drenched Mediterranean
vistas, Northern landscapes, and pastoral scenes”. His palette
lightened when he moved south, at least insofar as when he painted
outdoors. In 1940 he wrote to Matisse:
“During my morning walks I amuse myself by defining the different
conceptions of landscape, landscape as ‘space’, intimate landscape,
decorative landscape, etc. But as for vision, I see things
differently every day, the sky, the objects, everything changes
continually, you can drown in it. But that’s what brings life”.
I can’t imagine Matisse writing something like that. He was inclined
to pontificate about art more than Bonnard ever did, though the
latter did keep notebooks, in the form of pocket calendars, in which
he jotted down reflections on painting.
It’s intriguing to note, however, that, on the whole, their
letters are said not to contain a great many comments about art, and
instead often focus more on mundane matters relating to their
respective states of health, domestic concerns and, during the Nazi
occupation, the difficulties encountered when trying to obtain
petrol, food, etc.
Bonnard’s wife died in 1942, and despite whatever problems he had
experienced with her he was clearly affected by her absence. She had
been difficult at times. Margrit Hahnloser-Ingold, writing about the
friendship between Matisse, Bonnard, and “the Collector Couple
Hahnloser-Bühler”, says that, in the late-1920s, Marthe showed signs
of “increasing unsociability and paranoia……She forbade Bonnard’s
friends and colleagues from entering the house….She tried to seal
her husband off from the outside world”. Against the advice of
doctors, Bonnard refused to have her cared for in a clinic”.
There is, incidentally, an amusing, and perhaps enlightening,
reminiscence by Hans Robert Hahnloser of visiting Bonnard with his
parents, and being served tea “in the greatest variety of fragments
of old cups”.
Both artists created works on paper at times in their lives. I think
Matisse’s are probably those that are now most remembered,
especially the coloured paper cut-outs he produced in his later
years. They have been exhibited and praised in recent times, and his
1947 publication, Jazz, has been reprinted more than once.
I recall an exhibition at the
However, the drawings by Bonnard included in the book being reviewed
very much took my fancy. I was particularly impressed by his 1898
Some Aspects of Paris Life, published by Ambroise Vollard, in
which he produced a number of small, but effective sketches of
scenes in the city. They capture the atmosphere of the period.
Matisse Bonnard: Long Live Painting!
Is a beautifully-produced book, showing not only how the two artists
remained friends over the years, but also how they created, in their
separate ways, a body of work that has retained its vigour and
intensity. I admit to a preference for Bonnard, if I have to make a
choice, but that’s a purely personal response largely based on
reading the essays, looking at the illustrations, and reconsidering
an earlier reaction to his work. I visited a Bonnard exhibition of
paintings he did while living in
There is a nice anecdote relating to Matisse’s loyalty to the memory
of his friend. Shortly after Bonnard died a noted French critic
wrote an article in which he asked, “Is Pierre Bonnard a great
Painter?”. The answer to his own question was “No”. Matisse was
furious and wrote a letter to the journal concerned to say that he
disagreed with what had been said. He also painted over his copy of
the journal with the words: “Yes! I certify that Pierre Bonnard is a
great painter, for today and definitely for the future”.
There is a detailed chronology, notes, and a useful bibliography in
the catalogue, which was published in conjunction with the
exhibition, Matisse-Bonnard: Long Live Painting! at the
|