COLD
WAR SECRETS : A VANISHED PROFESSOR, A SUSPECTED KILLER, AND HOOVER’S
FBI
By Eileen Welsome
Kent State University Press (UK distributor – Eurospan). 266 pages.
£24.50. ISBN 978-1-606-354254
Reviewed by Jim Burns
On the 15th March, 1969, Thomas Riha said good night to a friend he
had been visiting, climbed into his car, and drove off. He had
seemed apprehensive, the friend said later, and thought he had been
followed to her house. She invited him to stay but he told her he
needed to go home. He was never seen again. His disappearance was
initially ascribed to his somewhat chaotic domestic circumstances,
which revolved around messy divorce proceedings he was involved in,
but the facts of his absence looked odd. He appeared to have gone
without taking any clothes, and he hadn’t told anyone that he was
intending to be away for a few days. As the days and weeks passed he
failed to get in touch with the university where he was an associate
professor in the Slavic Studies Department.
Riha was employed by the University of Colorado at Boulder. He had
been born in Prague in 1929, managed to survive the Nazi occupation
of Czechoslovakia despite having two Jewish grandparents, and left
the country not long before the Communist takeover in 1948. He was
in London for a time, but moved to the United States in 1947. His
mother and other relatives were living in California, so he went
there and enrolled as a student at the University of California,
Berkeley. He graduated in 1951 with a degree in political science.
But there then appear to be a couple of years where details of his
location and activities are scarce. According to Eileen Welsome:”He
may have been travelling, working some non-academic job that he
didn’t think important enough to put down on his résumé, or possibly
being trained as an intelligence agent”.
He next appeared in December, 1952, when he became a naturalised
citizen. Welsome says he studied at Columbia University’s Russian
Institute in 1953/54 and again in 1955/56. But he also served in the
army around the same time. He was posted to a Psychological Warfare
Centre in North Carolina, but if the testimony of one of his
fellow-soldiers is to be believed, did little of any consequence
while there. Riha spoke five languages, “including flawless
Russian”, but it doesn’t appear that the army put his skills to any
great use.
A master’s degree from Berkeley, and a Ph.D in Russian history from
Harvard followed. In 1958 he was an exchange student at Moscow
University. He had been warned not to try to enter Czechoslovakia
while on his way to Russia, but ignored the advice and flew to
Prague from Paris. Welsome says that Riha’s file in the StB (Czech
secret service) archives shows that he had been charged with leaving
the country “without permission” in 1947, so should have been
arrested when he entered Czechoslovakia. He was instead given a room
at the Flora Hotel in Prague, “an arrangement that suggests the
Communist government knew he was coming and had authorised his
visit”.
He was subject to surveillance while in Prague, but soon moved on to
Moscow after visiting Vienna, Copenhagen, and Helsinki. While in
Russia Riha “was allowed to travel freely” and to meet a variety of
people. He eventually returned to America, and a year or so later
was contacted by FBI agents who wanted to know about his experiences
in Russia. The Bureau already had a file on him and were aware,
through mail interception, that he had received Soviet “propaganda”
publications as early as 1954. These could, of course, have been
purely for study purposes. He seems to have assured the agents that
nothing he had done in Czechoslovakia or Russia could be construed
as detrimental to the interests of the United States. What he didn’t
tell the FBI was that he had been offered a professorship in
Bratislava, coupled with the promise of the return of some family
property in Prague that had been seized by the State, if he stayed
in Czechoslovakia.
In 1960 Riha obtained a teaching post at the University of Chicago,
where he “developed an innovative course on Russian civilisation
based upon the histories of three cities – Moscow, Kiev, and
Leningrad”. He spent a year at the University of Marburg in Germany,
during which time he visited Moscow and Leningrad. Curiously,
however, when he was back in Chicago, and his name was put forward
for an exchange programme with Czech academics, he was denied entry
on the grounds that some of their nominees had been turned down by
the Americans.
It was probably in Chicago that Riha first met Galya Tannenbaum, a
strange lady who was to play a significant part in the events
surrounding his disappearance in 1969.
She had an affair with Leo Tanenbaum, a Chicago businessman
and political cartoonist who was a member of the American Communist
Party. Prior to that she had been briefly married to a graphic
artist named Charles Russell Scimo, and had served a prison sentence
for “obtaining money by false pretences”.
A whole book could be written about Galya. She was a liar and
fantasist who claimed to be an FBI agent and to have a high position
in the INS (Immigration and Naturalisation Service), among other
security-related organisations.
It would seem that, during her relationship with Tanenbaum,
she was providing information to the FBI about American communists.
It was hardly likely to have been of any great value. The Party was
a shell of what it once had been and was riddled with informers. And
the FBI knew from another informant in Tanenbaum’s design studio
that Galya could not be relied on to tell the truth. It was Galya
who added the extra “n” to her name and later claimed that Tanenbaum
had fathered a child she had.
In 1967 Riha moved to Boulder where he had been offered “a
tenure-track job” in the history department at the University of
Colorado. At first, everything seemed to be going well. Riha got
along with his colleagues and was popular with students. The nature
of his relationship with Galya in Chicago doesn’t seem to have been
a particularly close one, but they renewed their acquaintanceship
when she turned up in Boulder in 1968. There was another problem,
too. Riha had entered into a quickly-arranged marriage to a young
woman named Hana who he had met in New York. From observations by
those who knew him, it didn’t strike them as a marriage likely to
last long, and it didn’t. The marriage took place in October, 1968,
and quickly fell apart. Hana had separated from Riha by the time he
disappeared in March, 1969, and claimed that he and Galya had tried
to kill her so that they could collect on a large insurance policy
he had insisted Hana agree to when they married.
Reading Welsome’s book it is obvious that some people took Galya’s
claims of high-level contacts in official circles seriously. There
were suggestions that Riha was wary of her, perhaps because she knew
something he didn’t want others to know. She had turned up at the
wedding reception and lured Riha away from his bride and guests for
a long conversation. And Galya was present in the Riha household on
the night when Hana, afraid for her life, climbed out of a window
and ran to neighbours for protection. Police who were called to the
scene detected a strong smell of ether in the room Hana had escaped
from. Telling the people who had helped Hana not to interfere, Riha
said that Galya was a colonel in military intelligence and was armed
with a pistol.
When Riha didn’t turn up at an academic symposium he was supposed to
attend, and couldn’t be located at home, it was at first assumed
he’d gone away for a few days because of the situation with Hana. But
as his absence lengthened enquiries began about his possible
whereabouts. Local police didn’t seem particularly interested in
pursuing the matter once they’d made a preliminary investigation of
the circumstances. It was a domestic dispute, as far as they were
concerned. And when the FBI and the CIA were contacted they claimed
they knew nothing about the case. Welsome’s investigations have
unearthed the fact that both agencies were aware of events as early
as April, 1969. And had files on Riha dating back to the
early-1950s.
It’s impossible not to think that there was something odd about the
response of the authorities to people asking about Riha’s
disappearance. Several times the answer came back that he was alive
and well and living in Brooklyn. And there were hints that he might
be living in Czechoslovakia. Welsome notes that more than one person
probing into the Riha case was told “You don’t want to know” or
advised “not to be interested” or “I suggest you drop it”. Fred
Gillies, a reporter for the
Denver Post, who on
and off over a ten-year period looked into the case, encountered
some evasion from local police. Welsome says that he remarked just
before he died, “There was so much espionage”.
So what did happen to Riha? It wasn’t long after he went missing
that Galya, claiming he had left some blank cheques and his credit
cards with her, took charge of Riha’s estate. She told people that
he had authorised her to “dispose of his assets”. She claimed that
she was owed seven thousand dollars she had loaned Riha when he
bought his house in Boulder. And she sold the house and his car. It
had been parked in Boulder, which was strange if he was supposed to
have left quickly to get away from his wife. It was noticeable that
any money that accrued as Riha’s house and belongings were disposed
of was paid into Galya’s account. Welsome calculates that Galya
received “roughly seventy thousand in today’s dollars from Riha’s
estate by using his credit cards, siphoning off his savings, cashing
his royalty cheques, and from monies obtained through the sale of
his home, his car, and his artwork”.
Did she murder Riha? She was not at any time accused of committing
the crime, though Welsome makes a convincing case for her being
responsible and for the killing of two other people not connected to
the Riha mystery. A sequence of misspellings of words she used in
paperwork relating to all three victims convinced Welsome that, with
other evidence, Galya must have been guilty. But she was never
actually charged with any of the murders, and was convicted of
forging signatures on cheques and a false will. Because of medical
reports that described her fantasies as dangerous, and diagnosed her
as a sociopath and/or psychopath, she was committed to the Colorado
State Hospital. She somehow managed to smuggle cyanide into the ward
she was placed on and committed suicide on March 5th, 1971. Cyanide
was the cause of death for two of the people she killed, but Thomas
Riha’s body has never been found so it’s only possible to hazard
guesses as to how he died.
There may be some people who will have doubts about whether or not
he was murdered. Or did he somehow make his way to Czechoslovakia
and spend the rest of his life there? It’s not likely, given that
the security archives in Prague were opened up when communism
collapsed in 1989. There surely would have been some traces of his
existence among the files and other documents. It is curious,
though, how the FBI and CIA continued to play down their possible
involvement in the case. Welsome, an experienced investigative
reporter, obtained many documents under the Freedom of Information
Act. They were, as usual, heavily redacted, but she could often work
out what was being referred to. None of it appears to indicate that
Riha was other than one of Galya’s victims.
Cold War Secrets
is a fascinating book, thoroughly researched and well-written. It
not only delves into Thomas Riha’s disappearance and death, but also
sheds light on the mood in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s.
There is a large cast of characters, ranging from academics to
secret agents, to members of the Communist Party, criminals, local
policemen, and more. They are often interesting in their own right,
for one reason another, and Welsome does more than just use them to
provide colour for her narrative. She makes them and the whole
confused situation come alive.
|